This is the place to support BabelCoach's effort to create and spread open learning content.
Some people just can't get past the fact that this is essentially panhandling or begging.
Panhandling ― to stop people on the street and ask for food or money ; to beg
We believe that we provide you with a unique way to make you happier.
If you want more Open Language Content. Donate to the BabelCoach Open Content Project. Each donation translates automatically into new open content on this site.
If you want to invite me (jens) for a beer by way of thanks. Use the button below to donate to the beer fund via paypal.
I'll point our readers to a finding that recently appeared in Science. Elizabeth Dunn (UBC) and her colleagues demonstrated that giving money to others makes us more happy overall than using that money for ourselves. While not emphasized in their paper, I think these findings raise an intriguing question that turns out to have a deep history in philosophy and in psychology: Do we ever act in a truly altruistic fashion? Many social scientists answer in the negative. For them, the only plausible motivation for any human action is self-interest. Now, if I take the Dunn et al. findings at face value, and decide that I'm going to start donating to charity solely because it will improve my happiness, I'm acting selfishly am I not? So is it possible that the only reason we do things that appear altruistic on the surface is for the happiness they bring us? That helping is just one among many things we can do to feel good (eat good food, have sex, go to a movie), and that's why we do it? (This question directly led to one of the most fruitful debates in social psychology--between those who think that we sometimes act solely out of concern for others and those who think we only help others for the hedonic rewards it provides). I'll let others chime in on the possibility of true altruism...
I'll point our readers to a finding that recently appeared in Science. Elizabeth Dunn (UBC) and her colleagues demonstrated that giving money to others makes us more happy overall than using that money for ourselves.
While not emphasized in their paper, I think these findings raise an intriguing question that turns out to have a deep history in philosophy and in psychology: Do we ever act in a truly altruistic fashion? Many social scientists answer in the negative. For them, the only plausible motivation for any human action is self-interest. Now, if I take the Dunn et al. findings at face value, and decide that I'm going to start donating to charity solely because it will improve my happiness, I'm acting selfishly am I not? So is it possible that the only reason we do things that appear altruistic on the surface is for the happiness they bring us? That helping is just one among many things we can do to feel good (eat good food, have sex, go to a movie), and that's why we do it? (This question directly led to one of the most fruitful debates in social psychology--between those who think that we sometimes act solely out of concern for others and those who think we only help others for the hedonic rewards it provides). I'll let others chime in on the possibility of true altruism...
Happier people give more and giving makes people happier, such that happiness and giving may operate in a positive feedback loop (with happier people giving more, getting happier, and giving even more).
Tutorial Vidéo
Témoignage
Looks weird, but it works for me.
Bob, Ireland
Les principes et les avantages de l'apprentissage retardé; sont connus depuis longtemps. Il est sympa qu'il y a aussi des exemples et des expressions.
Leo, France
Wäre schön mal ein paar deutsche Kollektionen zu sehen.
zappata, Deutschland
Best viewed with